THE WORLD RANKINGS SUPERVISORY CONFERENCE
|
Introduction
|
|
An International Classification of the best three years old and four
years old and upwards having run in 1977 in France, Great Britain and
Ireland was published for the first time in December 1977.
The principle of the introduction of such a Classification had been agreed
at the International Stewards' Meeting
held in Dublin in July 1977.
Then the details were finalised at a meeting in Paris in November 1977
between the official handicappers of the countries concerned.
This classification has been designated :
|
|
to stimulate interest in high class racing, both nationally
and internationally, |
|
|
to provide an accurate and impartial basis for assesment
and valuation of horses, |
|
|
to give breeders more accurate criteria for selection
than was available, |
|
|
to provide means of estimating improvement or deterioration
of thoroughbred performance in the leading European countries over
a period of years. |
The reactions of the Press were generally very good and the International
Classifications were also very well received in the racing world and considered
as a great improvement to determine the relative merits of the best European
horses.
It was used also to show the relative quality of the breeding in the
three countries concerned.
*
|
Presentation made at the 2001 Paris Conference
by Mr Ciaran KENNELLY,
Senior Handicapper, Head of Handicapping, Race Planning and International
Handicapping Department of the Hong Kong Jockey Club
|
The critical developments to the International Classifications lead by
the growing of international racing :
| 1977 |
Inaugural International Classifications published
containing horses from France, Great Britain and Ireland |
| 1985 |
Germany and Italy joined the Classification Committee.
|
| 1995 |
North American horses included in the International
Classifications |
| 1997 |
Horses trained in Japan*, U.A.E*., Hong Kong*, included
in International Classifications |
| 1998 |
Australian* and New Zealand* trained horses appear
in International Classifications |
* Only horses that ran in races open to International
competition were eligible for inclusion.
|
|
|
The number of countries who send representatives to
the World Ranking Supervisory Conference has increased from the
five European countries in 1985 to 12, including North America, Japan,
U.A.E., Hong Kong, Australia, South Africa and Singapore. |
|
|
The number of horses appearing in the International
Classifications has increase from 146 in 1977 to more than 650 in
the recent years. |
|
|
Originally the International Classifications were confined
to horses rated 120 or more now it includes horses rated from 110
upwards. |
*
|
|
Problems were encountered in the formation of the International Classifications
(IC) back in 1977 and in subsequent years as the IC expanded to include
new countries.
Firstly a similar Ratings scale for each country had to be implemented.
That was not a problem with the three founding countries in 1977 but not
every additional country that joined the International Classifications
operated in a similar manner. North America had no Rating System in existence
until they joined the World Ranking Supervisory Conference.
They however formed the North American Rating Committee (NARC) and developed
an International Rating scale similar to Europe. Other countries such
as Japan, U.A.E. and Hong Kong, also initiated an International Classification
Rating Scale in their countries so that the World Ranking Supervisory Conference could asses all eligible horses for inclusion into the International
Classification.
Likewise in the Asian Racing Federation region, Handicappers have adopted
the International Classification Scale for assessing horses in their Group/Graded
races. Work is progressing so that within a short space of time countries
like Singapore, Australia and New Zealand will have a compatible International
Rating system.
When North America joined the IC, two issues had to be resolved. Firstly,
how to treat the form of horses that race on "Turf" and "Dirt"? The International
Classifications treated the form on these surfaces independently, so horses
were given either a Dirt Rating or a Turf Rating.
Secondly, an issue that is highly emotive, medication. The Handicappers
based their Ratings purely on the results of the races so medication was
not an issue for the World Ranking Supervisory Conference. The sales
companies adopt a similar stance, as there is no reference to medication
in the pedigree or bloodline analysis pages
*
|
What are the practical uses for International Classification :
- Denoting "Champions" both Internationally and Nationally in the
various categories, e.g., distance, surface, age and sex.
As International racing continues to expand it is vitally important
that all major racing nations have a platform to demonstrate the quality
of their horses.
- Evaluation of Pattern Races.
Many countries utilise the International Ratings to assess their
Group/Graded Races. The International Cataloguing Standards Committee
(ICSC) rely on the International Classifications as their main reference
for assessing races with a view to their possible promotion from Part
2 to Part 1 of the ICS booklet.
- Selection of horses for International Races.
The International Classifications form the base from which horses
are selected/invited to participate in major International events.
Usually a Selection Panel of Handicappers/Racing Officials are asked
by the organisers of major events such as, The Breeders Cup, Japan
Cup, Hong Kong International Races, Dubai World Cup, Singapore International
Cup and many other International Races to rank the nominations.
- Breeding Industry
The ratings provide breeders with a means of assessing quality to
complement Black Type as currently used in sales catalogues.
- Assessing the merit of horses from different regions.
Globalisation of racing continues to increase and there is a necessity
for both the racing officials and the general public to understand
the relative merits of horses trained outside their region. For example,
ratings can assist individual Turf Authority's to gauge the relative
quality of imports. Also with more simulcast racing the customer needs
information regarding the form and ability of the horses in these
races no matter where they are running.
- Assessing horses nominated for International Handicaps.
The Melbourne Cup is the most high profile International Handicap
where horses from two Hemispheres and horses from at least three continents
contest this racing institution. To achieve a result where runners
from Australia, New Zealand and Europe can be separated by within
a length at the finish shows just how practical the International
Classifications Ratings are and the co-operation of Handicapper's
world-wide is vital in achieving these competitive results
*
|
|
The Future
Racing has become an International sport and has to compete with the
likes of Formula One, Tennis, Golf, Soccer, Rugby and Athletics. There
are other sports that could be mentioned but what they all have in common
is that they are attracting not just a local audience but a huge international
following.
The major sports have some mechanism as to demonstrate their "Champions"
and so should Racing. There is a need for both National and International
"Champions" to give racing a higher profile on a world-wide bases.
Racing has the mechanism already in place with the International Classifications.
However, the IC should be a true reflection of the top horses throughout
the world not just in one or two continents.
* * *
|
|
International Classifications Conference
|
The Conference was chaired from 1989 to 1995 by Capt. Michael BYRNE and
from 1996 to 2001, by Mr Geoffrey GIBBS.
*
|
| The 2002 World Ranking Supervisory Conference was held in Paris from
2 to 9 December to compile the 2002 International Classifications which
have been published in the 2003 International Cataloguing Standards Book
available at The Jockey Club Information Systems.
|
|
|
|
The 2002 Classifications were compiled by:
|
| France |
Gerald SAUQUE |
| Germany |
Harald SIEMEN |
| Great Britain |
Nigel GRAY |
| Guatemala |
Dominic GARDINER-HILL
Matthew TESTER
|
| Ireland |
Gary O'GORMAN |
| Italy |
Marco RINALDI |
| Japan |
Isamu KOSA |
| USA |
Frank GABRIEL
Mike LAKOW |
| Observers: |
|
| Australia |
James BOWLER |
| Canada |
Chris EVANS |
| Hong Kong |
Ciaran KENNELLY |
| Singapore |
Mike WRANKLIN |
| United Arab Emirates |
Melvin DAY |
| The Conference being chaired by Dominique de WENDEN |
|
|
|
|
|